Testing my quad using VRBRAIN + LEA-6 GPS

After a long time with wind, rain and snow, the weather turned in my favor, so I was able to test my frame using my great VRBRAIN + LEA-6 GPS.

The quad feels very responsive and stable (using the latest firmware). Tested standard mode, simple mode, alt hold, loiter and auto land – all without any problems.

Did not have anyone to help me filming, so I have only filmed a short test of loiter

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=uT_29bg_Fl4

It’s me moving in the end of the film, not the copter.

Hope to get more days like this

Thank you  Roberto, Emilie  and the rest of the team 

E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of FOXTEAM UAV CLAN to add comments!

Join FOXTEAM UAV CLAN

Comments

  • Great Job Oyvind your frame is beautifull  when you can try to check the vibration on acc_z so we can compare your result with the result of other configuration , could be very nice understand the result respect of standard apc and epp propeller.

    Best

    Roberto

  • + Using 16mm Carbone tubes and motor Mount/clamps from flyduino.net

    In my NeXT frame I plan to try using TAROT parts to make it foldable + other motor Mounts that have rubber rings to reduce vibrations..

  • Hi Emilie,

    This is my test frame that I´m using when planning/designing a new FPV Quad.

    2772932746?profile=RESIZE_1024x1024
    My config:

    VRBRAIN running code from master (downloaded 24.04)
    Tuning - only normal calibration using MissionPlanner
    ESC - 30 A hobbyking blueseries running SimonK firmware
    Motors - iPower iBM 2217Q 880Kv
    TX - Futaba T10 2.4Ghz FASST
    RX - FrSky TFR-4 using PPM out
    LiPo - 4000 mAh 3Cell
    Prop - Turnigy 10x4 Wooden SlowFlyer
    GPS - 3DR Ublox LEA-6

     

  • Emile ... do you have a file . PARAM for the VBrain to post here? I just want to look at it, I know your parameter could (or should) be different from mine but I want to see if there is something strange in my data.

    Rino

    PS. version 2.9.1.2beta

  • Thank you for testing :)

    It looks very stable. Could you post some details on  your configuration?

    Also are you using the latest master? If yes I will upgrade this version as a stable release, because we also tested quite a lot and had no issues.

    Emile

This reply was deleted.

Blog Topics by Tags

Monthly Archives